Scheme Rating
IME Scheme Rating
A call on the specific theme: We typically do not recommend Thematic funds to investors, since it requires getting in and out of the theme at the right time. Typically a strong contra approach (investing in themes when they are out of favour, and getting out when they are popular) leads to better performance, but this is very hard to actually implement in practice given strong behavioural instincts against such an approach (investors often end up entering themes post a run-up, which can often be the worst time to invest). In our view, thematic funds are primarily suitable for more astute investors who have a deep underlying understanding of the investment merits of the theme.
IME Strategy Rating
Diversified Thematic Strategy: White Oak India Digital Leaders focuses on companies that are emerging as leaders in the digital space through innovation and technology implementation in their respective sectors. The portfolio focuses on large and mid-cap comprises 40-60 companies. While we understand the merit/impact of technology and innovation across sectors, we believe the strategy has a very broadly defined digital mandate. This allows for many sectors/companies to be included that wouldn’t normally be considered “digitally native” diluting the mandate. Would have ideally preferred a more narrow tech focus.
PMS Scheme Ratings are driven by IME’s Proprietary Scheme Rating Methodology, which takes into account our ratings of the Scheme’s investment strategy, its maturity, the investment team, and our separate rating on the AMC that runs this particular scheme. Our views on each of these individual criteria are available via the IME RMS – which you can view by reaching out to one of our relationship managers (using either the live chat or book appointment feature on this site).
IME View on White Oak Digital Leaders
Investment Philosophy
RATIONALE FOR DIGITAL STRATEGY
- Technology investments lead to 1) better financial returns (translates to higher rev and EBITDA per employee) and 2) productivity gains (cost savings for customers, safety and compliance, and net new jobs created)
- Rising intangibles: High growth companies use high investment in intangibles to outgrow in the market. Intangibles have become the primary source of economic value in S&P 500 index. These companies have led large wealth creation over the past decade.
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
80% of the portfolio in companies that
- Investing in new technologies like AI, Blockchain, Machine Learning, Augmented Reality (AR)/ Virtual Reality (VR);
- Delivering world-class customer experience through new channels;
- Enabling ‘Digital India’ and developing products for the digital ecosystem
- Spearheading R&D in their respective sectors
- Adding strong automation capabilities
- Leaders in adopting technology in their businesses
WHITEOAK EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
The framework remains the same but tools evolve. WhiteOak continues to focus on Great Businesses (as characterised by superior returns on incremental capital, scalable long-term opportunity, and strong execution and governance) along with key characteristics of digital leaders (Building tech and facilitating innovation, new-age disruptive business models, and incumbents emerging as tech leaders via digital adoption and R&D).
Tools for evaluation: recurring usage, customer delight, ecosystems, and economics.
- Superior returns on incremental capital: focus on unit economics, industry characteristics, nature of structural competitive advantage
- Scalable long term opportunity: assessing TAM (total addressable market) and monetization opportunity
- Strong execution and governance: trajectory of customer acquisition metrics, engagement metrics, quality of network, evolution of network characteristics
Trailing Performance
1yr | 3yr | 5yr | Since Inception | |
---|---|---|---|---|
White Oak Digital Leaders | 29.2 | 5.1 | ||
S&P BSE 500 TRI | 38.9 | 19.3 | ||
Alpha over Broad Mkt BM | -9.7 | -14.2 |
Performance as of: 31-Jul-24 | Inception Date: 05-Jan-22
Fund Managers
Prashant Khemka | 5-star rated FM
Founder & CIO | 26 yrs Experience | 7 yrs at current firm
Past Experience: Goldman AMC (CIO – Global EM Fund), State Street Global (FM)
Prashant founded WhiteOak in 2017 with an impeccable investment track record. Prashant was the CIO & Lead Fund Manager for the Goldman Sachs India Equity & Global Emerging Market Funds. These funds have won multiple global awards and accolades for consistent investment performance. Over Prashant’s tenure GS India Equity scaled to a $2.5 bn fund from scratch (delivering 266% gross returns vs 66% for the benchmark), while GS GEM scaled from $675 mn to $2.6 bn (with a 36% gross US $ return vs 13.1% for the benchmark).
Fee Structure
Fee Structure | Fee |
---|---|
Fixed Fee Structure | 2.5 |
Variable Fee Structures | 1.5% + 20% over S&P BSE 500 Benchmark |
Exit Fees |
AMC
AMC: White Oak PMS (click link for detailed AMC review)
Highly recommended for more conservative investors seeking lower risk strategies: With the impeccable investment credentials of the founder & CIO, backed by a sound investment philosophy and a strong research team, White Oak is a solid choice for a PMS to deploy long-term capital.
AMC Rating
AMC Pedigree
AMC Size
Team Pedigree
Inv Philosophy
Performance
Free 30-Day Trial of the IME RMS
Details shared above, are only a short-snapshot of the more detailed analysis that resides in IME’s Proprietary RMS (Research Management Solution).
The IME RMS is the first tool ever, to give investors direct access to the insights of the central research team. Investors gain direct access to our ratings, rating rationales & analysis across thousands of funds (MFs, PMSs, AIFs, Global funds), asset classes, categories & more.
Note: PMS AMC & Scheme Reviews and Ratings are based on IME Capital’s Proprietary Review and Rating Methodology (read more here: AMC Rating & Scheme Ratings). These reflect the unbiased views of our central research team, based on our assessment of the investment value of these PMS/AIF strategies for our investors. We follow a highly stringent rating-criteria, where approximately 50% of PMS AMC’s & strategies would be rated 2-star or below (this is not meant to indicate that these funds are not investment-worthy, but that they do not currently fulfill the requirements we focus on for recommending funds to our investors — based on our internal views on the merit of the AMC/strategy relative to peers). Reviews & Ratings are primarily based on research of publicly available information (SEBI disclosures, PMS websites, PMS-aggregation platforms, webinar recording, media interviews etc.) and no explicit consent is required from AMCs for the same. While we endeavour to do further due-diligence via direct interactions with the investment teams of AMCs, this is typically restricted to AMC’s that meet our foundational fund selection criteria (reviews on lower-rated AMCs are often based solely on publicly available information). The views reflected in our Reviews & Ratings, are our independent views and may not be shared by the AMC’s and the investment teams. Please read detailed disclaimer for more.