Scheme Rating
IME Scheme Rating
The Scheme does not meet our selection criteria at this time
Wait for performance to improve: While Motilal has all the required credentials for a strong PMS strategy, continued underperformance in recent years with limited signs of strategies to turn around the same, lead to us not recommending Motilal BOP at this time. We would wait for clearer signs of performance to improve before recommending the same.
IME Strategy Rating
Strong Investment Process: Focused strategy with concentrated exposure to a few specific themes. We appreciate the level of concentration that Motilal runs on the portfolio (well below 20 stocks, major exposure in 2 sectors of financiers and consumption). There is a clearly defined investment philosophy of long-term investing in high-quality companies that meet Motilal’s QGLP Philosophy (Quality, Growth, Longevity, Price).
PMS Scheme Ratings are driven by IME’s Proprietary Scheme Rating Methodology, which takes into account our ratings of the Scheme’s investment strategy, its maturity, the investment team, and our separate rating on the AMC that runs this particular scheme. Our views on each of these individual criteria are available via the IME RMS – which you can view by reaching out to one of our relationship managers (using either the live chat or book appointment feature on this site).
IME View on Motilal AMC Business Opportunities
Investment Philosophy
Motilal’s Business Opportunity fund is a focussed multi-cap strategy, that aims to limit the number of stocks to between 20-25.
Motilal has a very clearly defined investment philosophy of long-term investing in high quality companies that meet their QGLP investment criteria. They have followed this strategy consistently for over 2 decades, with limited style drift.
The QGLP Framework:
- Quality of the Business and Quality of the Management: Stable businesses preferable consumer facing, with huge business opportunity and sustainable competitive advantages. Businesses run by competent management.
- Growth in Earnings: Driven by volume growth, price growth, mix change, operating and financial leverage.
- Longevity (of Quality and Growth): Dictated by long-term relevance of the business, extending competitive advantage period and sustenance of growth momentum.
- Price: Reasonable valuation, relative to quality and growth prospects with high margin of safety.
Once they have identified stocks that meet their strict QGLP criteria, Motilal aims to Sit Tight (by following a long-term buy-and-hold approach in concentrated stock portfolios.)
THEMES IN FOCUS
- Insurance: an underpenetrated market
- Lending Business: Consolidating space and private banks gaining market share from PSU banks
- High-Quality Economic Recovery: Distinctive and durable market leaders likely to benefit despite short-term headwinds
- Large-cap defensive plays: Pillars of the portfolio to help optimize risk and reward
Trailing Performance
1yr | 3yr | 5yr | Since Inception | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Motilal AMC Business Opportunities | 45.6 | 21.5 | 21 | 16.7 |
S&P BSE 500 TRI | 41.1 | 18.4 | 22.4 | 16.7 |
Alpha over Broad Mkt BM | 4.5 | 3.1 | -1.4 | 0 |
Nifty 50 TRI | 33 | 14.9 | 19 | |
Alpha over Category BM | 12.6 | 6.6 | 2 |
Performance as of: 30-Sep-24 | Inception Date: 18-Dec-17
Fund Managers
Prateek Agrawal | 5-star rated FM
Executive Director | 30 yrs Experience | 2 yrs at current firm
Past Experience: BoI AXA MF (Head of Equity), BNP Paribas MF (Head of Equity), SBI Capital Markets (Head of Research)
Prateek is the CEO of Motilal Oswal AMC. He has over 3 decades of experience in fund management and research, having worked in senior positions in BoI AXA MF, BNP Paribas MF, SBI Capital Markets and ASK. In his last stint at ASK, he was spearheaded the growth of ASK PMS over this period.
Vaibhav Agarwal | 3-star rated FM
Fund Manager | 13 yrs Experience | 3 yrs at current firm
Past Experience: Analyst bank loan Ratings(Crisil)
Vaibhav Agrwal is the founder of Teji Mandi, which is a platform aimed at helping retail investors in india navigate the volatility of the markets through affordable and quality advisory. He has managed a proprietary pms and has over a decade experience in stock picking and generating index-beating returns.
Fee Structure
Fee Structure | Fee |
---|---|
Fixed Fee Structure | 2.5 |
Variable Fee Structures | 1.5% fixed + 15% above 10% hurdle |
Exit Fees | 1yr(2%) |
AMC
AMC: Motilal Oswal AMC PMS (click link for detailed AMC review)
Not a top recommendation (at this time) due to weak recent performance: Motilal PMS comes with a very high level of pedigree. Co-founded by a highly-respected and pedigreed investor, Motilal has a number of advantages - stability of its core PMS investment team, very strong investment processes, a very clearly defined investment philosophy and the benefits of the backing of a strong broking & MF business. However, this strong pedigree has failed to reflect in the performance of the strategies (which have been weak, especially in recent years), which results in a lower 3-star rating for one of the more established PMS providers.
AMC Rating
AMC Pedigree
AMC Size
Team Pedigree
Inv Philosophy
Performance
Free 30-Day Trial of the IME RMS
Details shared above, are only a short-snapshot of the more detailed analysis that resides in IME’s Proprietary RMS (Research Management Solution).
The IME RMS is the first tool ever, to give investors direct access to the insights of the central research team. Investors gain direct access to our ratings, rating rationales & analysis across thousands of funds (MFs, PMSs, AIFs, Global funds), asset classes, categories & more.
Note: PMS AMC & Scheme Reviews and Ratings are based on IME Capital’s Proprietary Review and Rating Methodology (read more here: AMC Rating & Scheme Ratings). These reflect the unbiased views of our central research team, based on our assessment of the investment value of these PMS/AIF strategies for our investors. We follow a highly stringent rating-criteria, where approximately 50% of PMS AMC’s & strategies would be rated 2-star or below (this is not meant to indicate that these funds are not investment-worthy, but that they do not currently fulfill the requirements we focus on for recommending funds to our investors — based on our internal views on the merit of the AMC/strategy relative to peers). Reviews & Ratings are primarily based on research of publicly available information (SEBI disclosures, PMS websites, PMS-aggregation platforms, webinar recording, media interviews etc.) and no explicit consent is required from AMCs for the same. While we endeavour to do further due-diligence via direct interactions with the investment teams of AMCs, this is typically restricted to AMC’s that meet our foundational fund selection criteria (reviews on lower-rated AMCs are often based solely on publicly available information). The views reflected in our Reviews & Ratings, are our independent views and may not be shared by the AMC’s and the investment teams. Please read detailed disclaimer for more.