Scheme Rating
IME Scheme Rating
We do not currently recommend Marcellus Little Champs: While Marcellus has very strong pedigree, with a strong team and a very well defined investment philosphy, we do not believe that the current market environment is suitable for Marcellus’s very strong quality focus. After almost a decade of re-rating & consistent outperformance of high-quality franchises, their valuations have turned very expensive, leading to a high valuation base for continued outperformance. In addition, with the economy starting to turn around, a lot of previously laggard economically sensitive sectors are starting to perform (with many of these companies not meeting Marcellus’s investment criteria). This can potentially lead to the current strong underperformance continuing, until either Marcellus does not increase flexibility in their approach or the market environment changes.
IME Strategy Rating
Concentrated Small-Cap Strategy: It is a concentrated (20-30 stocks) small-cap strategy is a high-risk-reward strategy, but also one that is differentiated. Marcellus’s strong focus on clean accounting, corporate governance, capital allocation, and barriers to entry help mitigate many of the normal risks while investing in small-caps, which makes this an interesting investment option for investors willing to take on a higher level of risk.
PMS Scheme Ratings are driven by IME’s Proprietary Scheme Rating Methodology, which takes into account our ratings of the Scheme’s investment strategy, its maturity, the investment team, and our separate rating on the AMC that runs this particular scheme. Our views on each of these individual criteria are available via the IME RMS – which you can view by reaching out to one of our relationship managers (using either the live chat or book appointment feature on this site).
IME View on Marcellus Little Champs
Investment Philosophy
Marcellus Little Champs is a small-cap strategy that invests in 15-20 companies with excellent corporate governance and capital allocation track record and strong sustainable competitive advantages.
Key Aspects of Identifying Consistent Compounders
- Clean accounting
- Companies with a track record of superior capital allocation
- Companies that pass both those filters, identify those with high barriers to entry
Investment Process
Rigorous process to filter out based on 1) forensic accounts, 2) sustainability parameters, 3) bottom-up research, channel checks, and management meetings to invest in 12-15 high-quality companies.
- Forensic Accounting: Avoid companies with poor corporate governance from a universe of 1000 companies.
- Sustainability Parameters: Identify companies that pass certain sustainable parameters through median score on individual parameters along with top 20% on aggregate score. Avoid companies struggling to cover cost of capital and debt-laden companies.
- Bottom-up research: Detailed analysis of secondary resources along with channel checks, independent views and management meetings.
Sell Framework
Sell decisions are based on 2 factors i.e lower than expected free cash flow growth and uncertainty around ‘longevity score’ due to a slowdown in growth, weakness in moat and legacy.
- Free Cash Flow Growth: Weakening competitive positioning impacting slower growth
- Moat Score: Weakening franchise’s strength visible in pricing power
- Weakening Lethargy Score and Succession Planning
Trailing Performance
1yr | 3yr | 5yr | Since Inception | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marcellus Little Champs | 9 | -0.6 | 15.2 | 16.5 |
S&P BSE 500 TRI | 41.1 | 18.4 | 22.4 | 23 |
Alpha over Broad Mkt BM | -32.1 | -19 | -7.2 | -6.5 |
Nifty Smallcap 250 | 50.5 | 25.3 | 31.2 | |
Alpha over Category BM | -41.5 | -25.9 | -16 |
Performance as of: 30-Sep-24 | Inception Date: 29-Aug-19
Fund Managers
Saurabh Mukherjea | 5-star rated FM
Founder & CIO | 27 yrs Experience | 6 yrs at current firm
Past Experience: Ambit Capital (CEO), Noble (Head of India Equities), Accenture (Consultant), London Economics (Consultant)
Saurabh comes with a very strong investments background, having helped build Ambit’s broking, wealth & investment management businesses as CEO. He was also responsible for building Execution Nobles India broking business (which was sold to Ambit) and having set up and sold Clear Capital (a UK based small cap research fund). Saurabh is a strong believer in investing in the long-term in very high quality clean businesses and has written a number of books including Gurus of Chaos, The Unusual Billionaires and Coffee Can Investing.
Ashvin Shetty | 4-star rated FM
Portfolio Manager | 21 yrs Experience | 6 yrs at current firm
Past Experience: Analyst (Ambit), Analyst (Execution Noble), Statutory Auditor (KPMG)
Ashvin Shetty has more than a decade of experience in equity research. Previously, at Ambit, he led the coverage on automobile sector from 2010 to 2017. Ashvin was recognised multiple times for his stock picking abilities. He was ranked in Starmine Analyst Awards 2013 and 2016 as a lead auto analyst. He later moved onto become a senior analyst for Ambit’s Mid and Small cap PMS funds till November 2018. Prior to joining Ambit, he worked with Execution Noble as an analyst covering consumer and media space. He has also worked with KPMG’s and Deloitte’s statutory audit departments from 2004 to 2007 gaining extensive experience across Indian accounting standards and financial statement analysis. Ashvin is a BCom graduate from Narsee Monjee College (Mumbai). He is a qualified Chartered Accountant (ICAI India) and Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA Institute, USA).
Fee Structure
Fee Structure | Fee |
---|---|
Fixed Fee Structure | |
Variable Fee Structures | 1.5% fixed + 20% above 10% hurdle |
Exit Fees | 1yr (3%), 2yr (2%), 3yr (1%) |
AMC
AMC: Marcellus PMS (click link for detailed AMC review)
Not a top recommendation (at this time) due to weak recent performance: Built on the strong foundation of a strong founding team and a tightly defined and time-tested investment philosophy, Marcellus is a good option for investors seeking to invest only in the highest quality companies. However, the lack of flexibility in Marcellus's investment approach, makes it difficult for their strategies to perform across market conditions. The lower-rating for a pedigreed investment team, with a strong investment philosophy, is primarily driven by the weak recent performance & relatively lower flexibility for Marcellus to reposition portfolios in changing market environments.
AMC Rating
AMC Pedigree
AMC Size
Team Pedigree
Inv Philosophy
Performance
Free 30-Day Trial of the IME RMS
Details shared above, are only a short-snapshot of the more detailed analysis that resides in IME’s Proprietary RMS (Research Management Solution).
The IME RMS is the first tool ever, to give investors direct access to the insights of the central research team. Investors gain direct access to our ratings, rating rationales & analysis across thousands of funds (MFs, PMSs, AIFs, Global funds), asset classes, categories & more.
Note: PMS AMC & Scheme Reviews and Ratings are based on IME Capital’s Proprietary Review and Rating Methodology (read more here: AMC Rating & Scheme Ratings). These reflect the unbiased views of our central research team, based on our assessment of the investment value of these PMS/AIF strategies for our investors. We follow a highly stringent rating-criteria, where approximately 50% of PMS AMC’s & strategies would be rated 2-star or below (this is not meant to indicate that these funds are not investment-worthy, but that they do not currently fulfill the requirements we focus on for recommending funds to our investors — based on our internal views on the merit of the AMC/strategy relative to peers). Reviews & Ratings are primarily based on research of publicly available information (SEBI disclosures, PMS websites, PMS-aggregation platforms, webinar recording, media interviews etc.) and no explicit consent is required from AMCs for the same. While we endeavour to do further due-diligence via direct interactions with the investment teams of AMCs, this is typically restricted to AMC’s that meet our foundational fund selection criteria (reviews on lower-rated AMCs are often based solely on publicly available information). The views reflected in our Reviews & Ratings, are our independent views and may not be shared by the AMC’s and the investment teams. Please read detailed disclaimer for more.