facebook

Sanctum PMS

PMS Rating

IME PMS Rating

AMC does not meet our selection criteria at this time

Not a recommended AMC: At IME, we strongly believe that a PMS provider needs to come with a strong investment background. Wealth management-driven PMS's (like Sanctum PMS) can often achieve scale based on their in-house distribution strengths, but this does not make them an attractive investment option for PMS investors.

The PMS/AIF AMC Rating is derived on the basis of our analysis on 5 key qualitative parameters that we use to analyse the quality of a PMS/AIF Provider. These include an assessment of the size of the AMC, the pedigree of the AMC, the pedigree of the team, the value of the investment philosophy & the level of differentiation. These insights of our central research team are documented in the IME RMS, and can be accessed during a consultation call with an IME PMS specialist.

PMS Background

Discretionary AUM (380cr) | Promoter Category ()

PMS Background

Sanctum PMS is part of the Sanctum Wealth Management Group (created through the acquisition of Royal Bank of Scotland’s Private Banking business in 2016, by their senior leadership). While Sanctum has a strong wealth management practice, their investments skills are relatively nascent and unknown.

PMS Investment Philosophy

Sanctum PMS does not have a clearly defined investment philosophy at the PMS level, with strategies being driven at a scheme level instead.

Inv Team

Investment Team

Hemang Kapasi | 3-star rated FM

Fund Manager | 19 yrs Experience | 6 yrs at current firm

Past Experience: Canara Robeco (FM), ICICI Bank (Treasury)

Prior to joining Sanctum, Hemang worked at Canara Robeco for 9 years (3 years as a FM and 6 years as a Research Analyst). Before Canara Robeco, Hemang worked in the treasury department of ICICI Bank.

Salvin Shah | 2-star rated FM

Fund Manager | 12 yrs Experience | 5 yrs at current firm

Past Experience: Athena Capital (FM), Edelweiss (Analyst)

Salvin has 8 years of equity experience, having worked as a FM at Athena Investments and a Research Analyst at Edelweiss. Prior to joining the investments industry, Salvin worked as an associate in CA firms.

PMS/AIF Schemes

PMS & Listed Equity AIF Schemes

Scheme Category Style 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr Since Inc
Sanctum Indian Titans Large & Midcap GARP 21.9 15.3 18.2 14.3
Sanctum Indian Olympians Large Cap GARP 24 11.9 14.1 11.6

Returns as of 28-Feb-24.

Get substantially greater insights by connecting with us!

Details shared on the public website, are only a short snapshot of the more detailed analysis that resides in our Proprietary Research Management Solution (RMS) – A proprietary cloud-based tool, that ensures that the unbiased research insights of our central research team are shared directly with investors.

Our RMS allows us to operate with a level of transparency, ethics & consistency of insights, that is unparrarelled in the industry. Our RM’s will help showcase the PMS/AIF options that are the most suited for your unique requirements.

Download Sample RMS Reports: AMC View | Scheme Comparison

Note: PMS AMC & Scheme Reviews and Ratings are based on IME Capital’s Proprietary Review and Rating Methodology (read more here: AMC Rating & Scheme Ratings). These reflect the unbiased views of our central research team, based on our assessment of the investment value of these PMS/AIF strategies for our investors. We follow a highly stringent rating-criteria, where approximately 50% of PMS AMC’s & strategies would be rated 2-star or below (this is not meant to indicate that these funds are not investment-worthy, but that they do not currently fulfill the requirements we focus on for recommending funds to our investors — based on our internal views on the merit of the AMC/strategy relative to peers). Reviews & Ratings are primarily based on research of publicly available information (SEBI disclosures, PMS websites, PMS-aggregation platforms, webinar recording, media interviews etc.) and no explicit consent is required from AMCs for the same. While we endeavour to do further due-diligence via direct interactions with the investment teams of AMCs, this is typically restricted to AMC’s that meet our foundational fund selection criteria (reviews on lower-rated AMCs are often based solely on publicly available information). The views reflected in our Reviews & Ratings, are our independent views and may not be shared by the AMC’s and the investment teams. Please read detailed disclaimer for more.